Sacred Logic™

Self-assessment

A few quick questions — about five minutes. No signup, and your answers aren't linked to your identity.

This is a voluntary Article 95 code-of-conduct self-assessment, not a statutory EU AI Act conformity assessment. Your result is provisional — any Charter Mark still requires human validation by SACRED LOGIC™ or an accredited assessor.

Your organisation

Optional — helps us recommend the right Charter Mark tier for your size.

Existing EU AI Act compliance

Already compliant? The Compliance Fast Track skips the seven framework points the EU AI Act already covers — you complete only points 8–10, the areas it doesn't.

Part A — EU AI Act risk profile

Does the system fall into a banned category (social scoring, manipulative/subliminal techniques, real-time biometric surveillance in public by law enforcement, etc.)?

Does it make or materially influence decisions with legal/significant effect on people (hiring, credit, healthcare access, law enforcement, education, migration, biometric identification)?

Does it interact directly with end users (e.g. chatbot, recommendation engine, content generator), even without deciding anything of legal/significant effect?

Part B — Human Values Framework readiness

For each framework point, provide one combined proof document and tell us where you stand.

1. Human Agency and Oversight

Point 1 / 10

Human Oversight Dossier — one document covering your human-in-the-loop protocol (checkpoints, escalation and override procedures) and logs showing the staff who exercise oversight are trained and competent.

Where do you stand?

2. Technical Robustness and Safety

Point 2 / 10

Reliability & Incident Dossier — one document covering dated, repeatable technical reliability/verification records, plus an incident-response and disclosure plan.

Where do you stand?

3. Privacy and Data Governance

Point 3 / 10

Privacy & Data Governance Pack — one document covering a Privacy Impact Assessment with a data-processing inventory/map, and a published data-retention schedule.

Where do you stand?

4. Transparency and Explicability

Point 4 / 10

Transparency Pack — one document covering a public-facing system card, and a synthetic-content labelling policy with its audit trail.

Where do you stand?

5. Accountability and Governance

Point 5 / 10

Accountability Pack — one document covering a governance/responsibility matrix (e.g. RACI), and a complaints register with binding resolution timelines and an independent appeals route.

Where do you stand?

6. Fairness, Non-Discrimination and Accessibility

Point 6 / 10

Fairness & Accessibility Pack — one document covering dated, repeatable, metric-driven bias-audit logs, and a WCAG 2.2 accessibility conformance statement.

Where do you stand?

7. Societal and Environmental Well-Being

Point 7 / 10

Societal & Environmental Pack — one document covering an environmental/compute-footprint disclosure, and a societal impact assessment with a stakeholder-consultation log.

Where do you stand?

8. Creative and Intellectual Authorship Integrity

Point 8 / 10

Authorship & IP Pack — one document covering an AI-content disclosure statement, and an authorship-attribution policy with chain-of-title documentation for any AI-assisted works carrying IP claims.

Where do you stand?

9. Cultural and Epistemic Diversity

Point 9 / 10

Diversity & Cultural-Impact Pack — one document covering a dataset diversity/representativeness review, and a cultural-impact self-assessment with a stakeholder-representation record.

Where do you stand?

10. Proportionality and Lifecycle Stewardship

Point 10 / 10

Lifecycle Stewardship Pack — one document covering a documented risk-tiering methodology, and a re-certification schedule, change log and decommissioning policy.

Where do you stand?

Your answers are anonymous — nothing here is linked to your identity unless you choose to leave your email on the results page.